Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: Current Practices in Virological Investigations and Documentation in the French Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe pre-COVID-19 pandemic current practices in virological investigations, including type, frequency of samplings, and documented viruses, in sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) and to compare results according to the cause of death. STUDY DESIGN: Between May 2015 and December 2019, infants under 2 years of age included in the French SUDI registry were classified in one of 4 groups by causes of death according to the classification by Goldstein et al. : unexplained (SIDS), infectious, explained but noninfectious, and undetermined. Sampling sites and viruses detected were described, and then SIDS and explained deaths (control group) were compared. RESULTS: Among 639 infants, 3.6% died of an established viral infection. From 23 sampling sites and 2238 samples, 19 virus species were detected. Overall, 43.3% of infants carried a virus, with no significant difference between SIDS infants and the control group (P = .06). We found wide variations in frequencies of samples by site (550 for nasopharynx to one for saliva). The highest positivity rate was from the nasopharynx (195/2238; 8.7%). Rhinovirus was the predominant virus detected (135/504; 26.8%), mostly in SIDS (83/254; 32.7%). We found no significant difference between positivity rates and distribution of viruses between the SIDS and control groups. At-autopsy virological analysis never contributed to determining the cause of death. CONCLUSION: Current practices in virological investigations in SUDI are heterogeneous, with wide variability despite published guidelines. Investigations should be limited to the most relevant sites, and systematic at-autopsy sampling should be reconsidered. We found no association between virus detection and SIDS.

Postpartum Depression after Maternal Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The MUMI-19 Study (Mothers Undergoing Mental Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic).

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world by imposing unprecedented health measures, including in the postpartum period. OBJECTIVES: We aim to assess the impact of maternal isolation in the immediate postpartum period on the rate of postpartum depression (PPD) in a tertiary center. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort study, between 22 April and 29 October 2020, using anonymous questionnaires on 265 participants (129 during lockdown and 135 outside). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used as screening for PPD. We used a univariate logistic regression model to analyze the association between risk factors and PPD. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups for PPD assessed by an EPDS score >10.5 on day 30 and/or day 60 (23.1% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.661) but on day 3 it was higher (31% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015) during the lockdown period and partners were more impacted psychologically (48.3% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001). Parity ≥1 was a protective factor for PPD (OR = 0.2, 95% CI [0.1-0.6], p = 0.003). Risk factors of PPD were: history of psychological abuses (OR = 6.4, CI 95% [1.1-37.6], p = 0.04), stressful life event (OR = 4.5, CI 95% [1.6-12.6], p = 0.004), and bad birth experience (OR = 5.1, CI 95% [1.4-17.8], p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Maternal isolation in the immediate postpartum period is associated with an increased rate of moderate to severe symptoms of postpartum blues. The well-known long-term consequences of PPD must be balanced against the expected benefits of partner's restrictive access to maternity ward.

Shift in Clinical Profile of Hospitalized Pneumonia in Children in the Non-pharmaceutical Interventions Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against coronavirus disease 2019 were implemented in March 2020. These measures were followed by a major impact on viral and non-viral diseases. We aimed to assess the impact of NPI implementation in France on hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (hCAP) frequency and the clinical and biological characteristics of the remaining cases in children. We performed a quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analysis. Between June 2014 and December 2020, eight pediatric emergency departments throughout France reported prospectively all cases of hCAP in children from age 1 month to 15 years. We estimated the impact on the monthly number of hCAP using segmented linear regression with autoregressive error model. We included 2,972 hCAP cases; 115 occurred during the NPI implementation period. We observed a sharp decrease in the monthly number of hCAP after NPI implementation [-63.0% (95 confidence interval, -86.8 to -39.2%); p < 0.001]. Children with hCAP were significantly older during than before the NPI period (median age, 3.9 vs. 2.3 years; p < 0.0001), and we observed a higher proportion of low inflammatory marker status (43.5 vs. 33.1%; p = 0.02). Furthermore, we observed a trend with a decrease in the proportion of cases with pleural effusion (5.3% during the NPI period vs. 10.9% before the NPI; p = 0.06). NPI implementation during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led not only to a strong decrease in the number of hCAP cases but also a modification in the clinical profile of children affected, which may reflect a change in pathogens involved.

A very low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection but a high prevalence of other respiratory virus infections in children admitted to paediatric emergency departments.

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of infections by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses among children admitted to paediatric emergency departments (PEDs). METHODS: From April to July 2020, a prospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted in the PEDs of eight French university hospitals. Regardless of the reason for admission, a nasopharyngeal swab sample from each child was screened using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. We determined the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and identified risk factors associated with a positive test. RESULTS: Of the 924 included children (median [interquartile range] age: 4 years [1-9]; boys: 55%), 908 (98.3%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Only three samples were positive (0.3%; 95% confidence interval: 0.1-1) and none of these children had symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Of the 836 samples (90%) tested for other viruses, 129 (15.4%) were positive (primarily rhinovirus). Respiratory viruses were significantly more common in young children and in children with respiratory tract symptoms and fever. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among children admitted to emergency departments was low. In contrast, and despite social distancing and other protective measures, the prevalence of other respiratory viruses detection was high.